CTR is the Web

Picture 6

My friend Darren Herman has reinitiated a debate about the validity of Click Through Rate (CTR) as an online advertising metric.
On his blog he posted a great collection of quotes he obtained on the subject from some brilliant industry people. It's an important read. Interesting to me, of the 9
people asked only 1 was of the strong opinion that CTR was an important metric.

Now I understand many people in display advertising have a
vested interest in making CTR disappear as a success metric. After all 99.95%
of impressions don’t result in a click on a display ad. Any industry saddled
with such poor consumer response to their product would look at ways to
continue to validate itself
to its own customers (read ad dollars) in the face
of increased channel competition (Facebook, Apple, Google).

It’s also odd that display advertising seeks to minimize the
click when every other channel on the web values it so highly. This begins of
course with Google using CTR as the primary factor for its “Quality Score”
advertising algorithm – an algo that has built the greatest Ad business the
world has ever known. But it doesn’t stop there.

CTR is incredibly important metric in Email both in open
rates and in traffic. In Affiliate Marketing EPC or ‘earning-per-click” is the
primary success metric. Of course in web site optimization UX people understand
CTR on links and navigation is the number one factor to optimizing experiences.

Part of the reason Display advertising broke was because it
was built, bought and sold based on the principles of traditional media. I
can’t see how removing the only “new media” metric it has is progress. If
anything we might want to begin to pay more attention to CTR because
traffic is the most important resource the web has to offer.

Speaking of traditional advertising I’m reminded of this
great quote by Leo Burnett from 40 some odd years ago:

“involvement and
relevancy, of course, are as important as ever, but in the advertising din of
today, unless you make yourself noticed and believed, you ain't got nothin'.”

Part of my consternation with the CTR debate is looking at CTR
in a silo and making judgments about it in respect to overall performance. The
click is but one part of the online ad experience. The click is involvement and relevancy –
the click is realtime and realtime is more important then ever in today’s
world. The click is also an important proxy for the effectiveness of creative
images and messaging.

CTR though is most important in relation to other
metrics. Site placements, keywords, conversion rates, average order values and
on and on. To effectively optimize we need to look at results across datapoints
and understand the interactions and effects. Most of all, we can always learn something
by looking at CTR. As a marketer and advertiser knowledge is my greatest asset.
Taking that learning away would be foolhardy and I’ll fight any advertising Luddite
that tries to do it. You see, that's not my cursor at the top of this post – that's my pistol.



, , ,



2 responses to “CTR is the Web”

  1. Darren Herman Avatar

    Jonathan, thanks for continuing my original post. I do have a question for you: you use email and search as validating that CTR is important. Have you tried using VTR (view thru rate) on those two? My gut tells me that if you had that data readily available across those mediums that you’d very quickly stop paying attention to CTR. No?


  2. Jonathan Mendez Avatar

    Darren- thanks for the comment – & thanks again for raising the issue and igniting the conversations from your original post and preso.
    Until Google changes their algo to place more emphasis on conversion rates (scarily, a metric that they have growing visibility into) CTR will continue to be a metric that Search Marketers need to optimize for.
    I have large issues with VTR attribution and issues around the validity of the data are well documented. I would never use VTR to gauge the overall effectiveness of a campaign. I *am* fascinated by latency and I think there are some amazing opportunities to develop better solutions for marketers to understand latent behavior and its impact, but I digress.
    Bradd Libby, a Search Marketing guy has an interesting post dismissing CTR that I responded to: http://bit.ly/9laG5D
    The important part of my response was that online advertising is always a blend of volume and performance (Cost Per) and CTR is an important part of volume.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

%d bloggers like this: